The next SOE Congress will take place from 10–13 June in Barcelona Spain SOE 2017 European Society of Ophthalmology 10–13 June in Barcelona Spain

European Society of
Ophthalmology

Course Evaluation April 2006

KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET EVALUATION

Medical Management Centre

5 April 2006

EUROPEAN OPHTHALMOLOGY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Did the programme meet your needs and expectations?

If yes, tell how. If no, tell why.

” Yes.

” Yes, innovative approach.

” Yes, lots of diverse topics. Extremely well organised.

” Yes, gave me the opportunity to approach some problems with different style.

” Yes, it gave an insight into problems usually not addressed in daily routine-work.

” –

” Yes, everything was very useful for me. Discussions were excellent.

” Yes, I have got good explanations about the topics which were covered by the “home-reading”.

” In 70 % YES, it’s really hard to organise a “leadership programme”. I would rather call it a management programme.

” Yes.

” A detailed and professional overview of leadership and its impact in our activity.

” Yes, I came with an open mind and will take home several key points and issues to think about.

” Yes, both specific and broad.

What did you value most in the programme?

” The efficiency and structure of the talks

” Excellent moderated discussions

” Introduction to ??? law. Social programme.

” The evaluation/analysis of the strategies to lead

” The opportunity to interact

” –

” Discussions.

” The discussions (with and) to the politicians.

” To have the insight of decision making.

” Introduction sections, excellently ???

” Discussions.

” The active interaction between us all.

” Concrete topics, high quality discussions, professionally guided.

What did disappoint you?

” Some of the lectures were very theoretical

” –

” Too much “leadership” talks. Lots of overlap.

” –

” Nothing

” –

” Nothing.

” Non.

” The weather.

” –

” Sincerely nothing.

” The visit to the Diabetes Association.

” First talk by Prof. Busse too long.

Were you satisfied with the balance between lectures and interactive sessions?

” Yes.

” Yes.

” GOOD.

” Yes.

” Yes.

” –

” Yes.

” Yes, I think that was kindly balanced.

” I think at this stage it was enough. (The participants did not know well each other).

” Yes.

” Satisfied.

” Yes.

” Yes.

What would you have preferred done differently?

” More interaction between the speakers and our group

” –

” (Even) more social programme

” –

” –

” –

” Access to the room.

” Non.

” Nothing.

” The programme should be less packed, perhaps.

” More open discussions.

” –

” ?

Did you find the pre-reading useful?

” No. Extremely detailed.

” It is useful.

” Yes

” –

” Yes

” –

” No.

” Yes.

” Yes, many thanks for that.

” Yes.

” Not all suggested papers.

” Of limited use.

” No.

What are your views on the prior information of the module and module arrangements?

” Very informative.

” Very good.

” Good, sufficient

” –

” –

” –

Very good.

” Good introduction. Helped a lot to understand a little bit different topic and language than what we use in professional communication.

” It was perfect.

” I didn’t have a lot of prior information but I was more than satisfied with the ???

” Information should be more detailed.

” –

” –

Could you rate the usefulness of the different parts of the programme (please tick):

Item Usefulness
1=not useful 2=some-what useful 3=useful 4=highly
Busse: EU health legislation and policy 1 5 7
Ovretveit, Patient empowerment and consumerism 2 6 5
Gregor, Challenges of leadership 3 4 6
Hawlina, Future leaders 2 7 4
Prause, The professor as leader 1 4 7
Van Rij, Running a department 2 4 6
Carder, Alcon 3 4 4 2
Nilsson, Santen 2 5 5
Norrgren, Allergan 4 6 3
Brommels, Summary of the day 1 1 11
Brommels, Introduction to advocacy 1 12
Visit to Diabetes Association 3 8 2
Exercise and discussion with politicians 1 1 12
Philipson, Leadership in the private sector 6 4 3
Brennan, How to influence decision makers 2 6 5
Bermudez Svankvist, Management by love 5 2 2
Visit to SBU 2 7 4
Brommels, Implementing guidelines 1 4 8
Nilsson Bågenholm, Physician leadership 7 3

© 2017 SOE – European Society of Ophthalmology