The next SOE Congress will take place from 8-11 June 2013 in Copenhagen DenmarkSOE 2013 European Society of Ophthalmology 8-11 June 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark

European Society of
Ophthalmology

Course Evaluation April 2006

KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET EVALUATION

Medical Management Centre

5 April 2006

EUROPEAN OPHTHALMOLOGY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Did the programme meet your needs and expectations?

If yes, tell how. If no, tell why.

” Yes.

” Yes, innovative approach.

” Yes, lots of diverse topics. Extremely well organised.

” Yes, gave me the opportunity to approach some problems with different style.

” Yes, it gave an insight into problems usually not addressed in daily routine-work.

” -

” Yes, everything was very useful for me. Discussions were excellent.

” Yes, I have got good explanations about the topics which were covered by the “home-reading”.

” In 70 % YES, it’s really hard to organise a “leadership programme”. I would rather call it a management programme.

” Yes.

” A detailed and professional overview of leadership and its impact in our activity.

” Yes, I came with an open mind and will take home several key points and issues to think about.

” Yes, both specific and broad.

What did you value most in the programme?

” The efficiency and structure of the talks

” Excellent moderated discussions

” Introduction to ??? law. Social programme.

” The evaluation/analysis of the strategies to lead

” The opportunity to interact

” -

” Discussions.

” The discussions (with and) to the politicians.

” To have the insight of decision making.

” Introduction sections, excellently ???

” Discussions.

” The active interaction between us all.

” Concrete topics, high quality discussions, professionally guided.

What did disappoint you?

” Some of the lectures were very theoretical

” -

” Too much “leadership” talks. Lots of overlap.

” -

” Nothing

” -

” Nothing.

” Non.

” The weather.

” -

” Sincerely nothing.

” The visit to the Diabetes Association.

” First talk by Prof. Busse too long.

Were you satisfied with the balance between lectures and interactive sessions?

” Yes.

” Yes.

” GOOD.

” Yes.

” Yes.

” -

” Yes.

” Yes, I think that was kindly balanced.

” I think at this stage it was enough. (The participants did not know well each other).

” Yes.

” Satisfied.

” Yes.

” Yes.

What would you have preferred done differently?

” More interaction between the speakers and our group

” -

” (Even) more social programme

” -

” -

” -

” Access to the room.

” Non.

” Nothing.

” The programme should be less packed, perhaps.

” More open discussions.

” -

” ?

Did you find the pre-reading useful?

” No. Extremely detailed.

” It is useful.

” Yes

” -

” Yes

” -

” No.

” Yes.

” Yes, many thanks for that.

” Yes.

” Not all suggested papers.

” Of limited use.

” No.

What are your views on the prior information of the module and module arrangements?

” Very informative.

” Very good.

” Good, sufficient

” -

” -

” -

Very good.

” Good introduction. Helped a lot to understand a little bit different topic and language than what we use in professional communication.

” It was perfect.

” I didn’t have a lot of prior information but I was more than satisfied with the ???

” Information should be more detailed.

” -

” -

Could you rate the usefulness of the different parts of the programme (please tick):

Item Usefulness
1=not useful 2=some-what useful 3=useful 4=highly
Busse: EU health legislation and policy 1 5 7
Ovretveit, Patient empowerment and consumerism 2 6 5
Gregor, Challenges of leadership 3 4 6
Hawlina, Future leaders 2 7 4
Prause, The professor as leader 1 4 7
Van Rij, Running a department 2 4 6
Carder, Alcon 3 4 4 2
Nilsson, Santen 2 5 5
Norrgren, Allergan 4 6 3
Brommels, Summary of the day 1 1 11
Brommels, Introduction to advocacy 1 12
Visit to Diabetes Association 3 8 2
Exercise and discussion with politicians 1 1 12
Philipson, Leadership in the private sector 6 4 3
Brennan, How to influence decision makers 2 6 5
Bermudez Svankvist, Management by love 5 2 2
Visit to SBU 2 7 4
Brommels, Implementing guidelines 1 4 8
Nilsson Bågenholm, Physician leadership 7 3

© 2012 SOE – European Society of Ophthalmology